Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Santoro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv02044
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Patricia Santoro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santoro et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01796
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Christine Santoro and Steven Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Billeris v. The Incorporated Village of Bayville, New York et. al.
as 2:2020cv03298
Defendant:
Does Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc. Village of Bayville, New York, 1 through 5, Chairman, Henry Pinkerton, Paul Rupp and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Billeris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santoro v. Fitbit, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07130
Defendant:
Fitbit, Inc., Christopher Paisley, James Park and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Santoro
Falco v. Santoro et al
as 2:2018cv02480
Defendant:
June Johnson, Spectrum Psychology Services, PCLLC, Sea Aire Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Falco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Falco v. Santoro et al
as 2:2017mc00440
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Falco
Defendant:
Anthony Santoro and Spectrum Psychology Services, PCLLC
Keyes v. Lungo et al
as 2:2017cv00181
Defendant:
Meryl Berkowitz, County Court, Grand Jury and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
