Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Tipoo v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mohammed A. Tipoo
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and Corrections Officers John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Malik v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09070
Plaintiff:
Thomas Malik, Louis Scarcella and Stephen Chmil
Defendant:
City of New York, The City of New York, Jane Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Irons v. Scarcella et al
as 1:2023cv07633
Plaintiff:
James Irons
Defendant:
Louis Scarcella, Stephen Chmil, Michael Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05555
Plaintiff:
Karon Evans
Defendant:
The City of New York, MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY ERIC ADAMS, NYPD POLICE COMMISSIONER KEECHANT SEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
