Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dorsey et al v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04662
Plaintiff:
Deborah Dorsey and Edward Dorsey
Defendant:
Exactech Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., Osteon Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Brooklyn Wild Catch LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Caleb Anderson
Defendant:
Brooklyn Wild Catch LLC, Brooklyn Wild Catch II, LLC, Robert Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Duenas v. Square, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05822
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Duenas
Defendant:
Square, Inc., Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha and others
Joseph v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv03957
Defendant:
S.P.O. Kennedy, Anthony J. Annucci, Bill de Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Gannon et al
as 1:2020cv01525
Plaintiff:
Classie M Dorsey
Defendant:
James P. O'Neill, City of New York and Vincent F Gannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wexler v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP et al
as 1:2018cv03066
Plaintiff:
Shimshon Wexler
Defendant:
Dorsey & Whitney, LLP and Artin Betpera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Knopf et al v. Esposito et al
as 2:2017cv04084
Defendant:
Nathaniel H. Akerman, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, Frank M. Esposito and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knopf and Norma Knopf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Dorsey
as 1:2016cv03550
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dorsey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.,
as 1:2014cv05356
Plaintiff:
Andre Dorsey
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
