Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Harrell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02794
Plaintiff:
Robert James Harrell, Jr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barreca et al v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC et al
as 1:2023cv07972
Plaintiff:
Judi Barreca and Jennifer Harrell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harrell v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv02938
Plaintiff:
Donte Harrell
Defendant:
Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07891
Plaintiff:
Darist J Harrell and Wanda Harrell
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrell v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06264
Defendant:
CVS Albany, L.L.C., CVS Health and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deloris Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bryant v. Norde et al
as 1:2016cv01428
Plaintiff:
James Bryant
Defendant:
John Doe, B. Harrell, P Norde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harrell v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00667
Defendant:
Detective Sylvia Bone, City of New York, Detective Robert Dewhurst and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
