Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ubalde v. Maimonides Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv03948
Plaintiff:
Rina Ubalde
Defendant:
Maimonides Medical Center, Kathyann McClean, Dorothy Jean Graham Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
McClean v. Exactech US, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02969
Petitioner:
Robert K McClean
Respondent:
Exactech U.S., Inc., Exactech Inc, TPG Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2021cv05702
Plaintiff:
Danielle Robinson and Javon McClean
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and William Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Scotto v. McClean et al et al
as 1:2019cv04755
Defendant:
Luxembourg Consular, Union Bank of Suisse et al, M. Dyer & Sons and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roland v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv02240
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Roland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McClean v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01985
Plaintiff:
Franciene McClean
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05913
Defendant:
P.O. Brathwaite, P.O. Carl Dagostino, P.O. John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Lansford Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClean v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv02372
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shawn McClean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sage-El v. Power et al
as 1:2015cv07417
Defendant:
C.O. Alvares, Judge M Armstrong, J Campanelli and others
Plaintiff:
Sage-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
