Cases 61 - 70 of 5,812
Dudley v. Burgos et al
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Tamara Burgos and Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dudley v. Montaque
as 5:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Myra Montaque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Schemit
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Eric Schemit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wellington v. Broome County District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Kennard Desmond Wellington
Defendant:
Broome County District Attorney's Office, Michael A. Kurchak and Joseph F. Cawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Higbie et al v. James et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Carl Higbie, Joseph Harris and Michael Votruba
Defendant:
Steven G. James, Sheriff Kyle Bourgault, Sheriff Donald J. Krapf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Godbold v. Field et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Marshall Godbold
Defendant:
Newell B. Field and Patrick McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
