Cases 61 - 70 of 5,827
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Farina v. Davis
as 8:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
John Farina
Defendant:
Emily Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Hudson Shore Associates Limited Partnership et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Hudson Shore Associates Limited Partnership, Haven on the Hudson LLC, Kenneth Levinson and others
Defendant:
The State of New York, The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, The Village of Nyack, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Bishme Smith
Defendant:
Teresa Johnson, Michelle Folino, Renee Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterkin v. Mullin et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Anthony Peterkin
Defendant:
M. Mullin and M. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Muhammad v. The World Bank Group et al
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
The World Bank Group, Ajay Banga and Anshula Kant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
