Cases 1 - 10 of 505
Rodriguez v. Shattuck et al
as 8:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Keith Rodriguez
Defendant:
Arthur Shattuck, Gary Pasqua, Sarah Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry Santiago
Defendant:
City of Rome, City of Rome Police Department, Officer Joseph Longo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maciol et al
as 6:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Maciol, Oneida County Sheriff's Department, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Williams v. Pelosi et al
as 5:2024cv00620
Defendant:
John Doe, Zachary Pelosi and Twist
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chennells v. Curran et al
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Chennells
Defendant:
Michael J. Curran, Edward Haynes, Will Devin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landry v. Deputy John Doe
as 5:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Monica Landry
Defendant:
Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sangare v. The City of Albany et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Samira Sangare
Defendant:
The City of Albany and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes et al v. Slayton et al
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Shane T. Stokes, Sr. and Susan C. Johnson
Defendant:
James Slayton, Roger Anthony, Matthew Androsko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Rachael Hart
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Sonupreet Kaur, Town of East Greenbush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
