Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rosario v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv01112
Plaintiff:
Tremel Rosario
Defendant:
Jon Doe, Joe Doe, Jon/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry v. State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rondue Gentry
Defendant:
State of New York, David Hurley, Heath McCrindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingram v. Sharpe et al
as 5:2019cv00313
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lamont Ingram
Defendant:
James M. Hanley, Gary L. Sharpe and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Murphy et al
as 5:2018cv00607
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander
Defendant:
Thomas J. Murphy, Pappas, Cox, Kimpel, Dodd & Levine, PC and Greene, Hershdorfer & Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Heid et al
as 8:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
Gavin C. Thomas
Defendant:
Larry Heid, Christopher Cornell, P. David Soares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. Albany County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Clemmons
Defendant:
Albany County District Attorney's Office, Steven M. Sharp, Tracy Steeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos v. Huggins et al
as 1:2014cv00687
Plaintiff:
Tomas Burgos
Defendant:
A. M. Huggins, Bryan Haag, David R. Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neroni v. Peebles et al
as 3:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant:
David E. Peebles, Matthew Holmes, Gary L. Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Peterson v. Sharpe et al
as 8:2013cv00568
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Gary L. Sharpe, Thomas J. McAvoy, Andrew T. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
