Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Woloszyn et al v. County of Tioga et al
as 3:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Aimee Rice, Terry Ann Woloszyn, Esther Haines and others
Defendant:
County of Tioga and James McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eggsware v. Google et al
as 1:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Shawn Eggsware
Defendant:
Google, Instagram, Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maitland, MD v. The State of New York et al
as 5:2021cv00475
Defendant:
David Feiglin, MD, Upstate University Hospital, University Radiology Associates, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Ceceleta Maitland, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Crawley v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2017cv01389
Plaintiff:
Maurice Crawley
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Vallon Smith, Frank Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Mundy et al
as 8:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Terry Gordon
Defendant:
Stephens Mundy, Deborah Stewart, Paul Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DePonceau v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lowry v. Belli et al
as 6:2007cv00847
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lowry
Defendant:
Nicola Belli, Angelita Clymen and Amsterdam Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Trinity United Methodist Church et al v. DiLello et al
as 1:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
Trinity United Methodist Church and Maurice E. Drown
Defendant:
Nicholas DiLello, City of Albany and James Tuffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
