Cases 1 - 10 of 5,826
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Williams v. Leach et al
as 5:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Leach, Andrew Young and Micheal Merkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shibley et al v. Bixlerond et al
as 6:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Annamay Shibley and Christopher Wheeler, Sr.
Defendant:
Jennifer Bixlerond, Department of Social Services, Mohawk Valley Community Action Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Burley et al v. Chapman
as 8:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
McKay Burley and Tyson Thomas
Defendant:
Charles J. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Zhao v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Tianqi Zhao
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry Santiago
Defendant:
City of Rome, City of Rome Police Department, Officer Joseph Longo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nance v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Nashon Nance
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Leonard Brown and Police Officer Andrew Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
