Cases 21 - 30 of 581
Bass v. Schenck et al
as 9:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Johann Alexander Bass
Defendant:
Brian P. Schenck, William Steven Smith, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Carpenelli et al
as 9:2022cv01094
Plaintiff:
Benji D. Reed
Defendant:
Michael Carpenelli, Timothy Thayer, James Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams II v. Gonzalez
as 9:2022cv01054
Petitioner:
Charles R. Williams II
Respondent:
Esteban B. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
William M. Dean
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Patrick D. Reardon, D. Debejian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danielson v. Donahue
as 9:2022cv00676
Petitioner:
William Danielson
Respondent:
J. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Yehl
as 9:2022cv00672
Petitioner:
Randy Williams
Respondent:
Chris M. Yehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Smith
as 9:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Marquise Williams
Defendant:
Marquis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. Debottis
as 9:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman and Kenneth W. Kaufman
Defendant:
Debottis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. King et al
as 9:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwin Blanchard
Defendant:
Sgt. King, C.O. Feliciano, Adam C. Christon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman
Defendant:
Onondaga County Sheriff's Department, Syracuse Justice Center, Jamesville Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
