Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Decker v. Lilley
as 9:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
David J. Decker
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Lilley
as 9:2023cv01478
Petitioner:
Coreen Harris
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloley v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Maxmillian Sloley and BX
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Correction Officer Joyce, P.A. Milov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Lilley
as 9:2023cv00939
Petitioner:
Terrell Jenkins
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chambers v. Lilley
as 9:2023cv00931
Petitioner:
Gary Chambers
Respondent:
Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos et al v. Parmitel et al
as 9:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos, Windsor Coleman, Miguel Melendez and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmitel, Chaz Andrews, W. N. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Lilley et al
as 9:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
Eric Harris
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Cheryl V. Morris, Lynn M. McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Box v. Lilley
as 9:2022cv01093
Petitioner:
Kyle A. Box
Respondent:
People of the State of New York and Lynn Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
