Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Shabazz et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 5:2010cv01374
Plaintiff:
Ahmed J. Shabazz and Rosamond C. Palmer
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cole v. New York State Department of Correctional Services et al
as 9:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cole
Defendant:
D. Ashe, Cappadonia, Edward Dauphin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. State of New York, et al
as 9:2003cv01010
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
R. Palmer , S. Griffin , M. Terry and others
Counter_claimant:
S. Griffin , R. Palmer and M. Terry
Counter_defendant:
James Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flemming v. Fisher
as 9:2009cv01185
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Debbie Kemp, Jeffrey Hyde, George Waterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Arquitt et al
as 9:2009cv01110
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Timothy Arquitt, James H. Anctil, Terry Ashlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. LeCorey
as 9:2009cv00935
Petitioner:
Paul F. Palmer
Respondent:
Patricia LeCorey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
Alicia Palmer
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Donald Selsky, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Emerson v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 9:2008cv00824
Plaintiff:
Montell Emerson
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, Brian Fischer, Lester Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
