Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Stacia Cullors et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 1:2022cv00677
Defendant:
Nurture, Inc., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Nurture, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stacia Cullors, L. C., N. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Laspisa v. Citifinancial Company et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Does 1 to 20, Carrington Morgage Services, Citifinancial Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Laspisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Laspisa v. Carrington Mortgage Services et al
as 1:2018cv00211
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, Does 1 to 20 and Carrington MS, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Laspisa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Laspisa v. Citifinancial et al
as 1:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Laspisa
Defendant:
Citifinancial and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Alke v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
Erik Alke
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Steven Racette, Richard Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knapp v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
Patricia Knapp
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Healthcare Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dungan et al v. The Academy at Ivy Ridge et al
as 7:2006cv00908
Plaintiff:
Shelley Dungan, Patricia A. MacRae, Holly Stepp and others
Defendant:
Teen In Crisis, LLC, Academy at Ivy Ridge, LLC, Premier Educational Systems, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Roger Keroack, Tommy Lee Halford, Jr., Irene Pfeffer and others
Counter Claimant:
Jason G. Finlinson, Northwest Association of Accredited Schools, Inc., Teen In Crisis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
