Cases 1 - 10 of 26
IBEW Local 236 Health and Benefit Fund et al v. Gill Technical Consulting, Inc
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 236 Health and Benefit Fund, IBEW Local No 236 Pension Fund, IBEW Local No 236 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Gill Technical Consulting, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bruni v. Sheehan et al
as 9:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carl Bruni
Defendant:
Kathy M. Sheehan, Dixon, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Viatris Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv01187
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill
Defendant:
Viatris Inc., Mylan Specialty L.P., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Odell-Gill v. CFCU Community Credit Union
as 3:2021cv01102
Plaintiff:
Jessica Odell-Gill
Defendant:
CFCU Community Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Brown et al
as 9:2020cv00622
Defendant:
C.O. P. Boule, Lt. G. Murphy, R.N. Christy and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reddy v. Abitbol et al
as 5:2019cv01493
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Gilles R. R. Abitbol, Esq., Bond, Shoeneck & King, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deepika Reddy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gill v. USA
as 5:2019cv00842
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Upstate Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2013cv01387
Plaintiff:
Dennis Watkins
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility, Lieutenant Quinn, Sergeant Santimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Gill v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01511
Plaintiff:
Laura Gill
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
