Cases 1 - 10 of 3,382
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Defendant:
K. Sorrell, Trim, T. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burley et al v. Chapman
as 8:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
McKay Burley and Tyson Thomas
Defendant:
Charles J. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
George v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Marie George
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santoro v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
John N. Santoro, Jr.
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Timothy D. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hendricks v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Terrie Lee Hendricks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Toby Edward Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Homles v. Shabirr et al
as 9:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jalen Homles and Jalen Holmes
Defendant:
A. Shabirr, J. Huntington, J. Folwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott Hook v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ian J. Abbott Hook
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Donald v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Renee Donald
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
