Cases 1 - 10 of 248
Becerra-Paez v. Syracuse University
as 5:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Diego Becerra-Paez
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Dvir v. Universal Technologies, LLC
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Natan Dvir
Defendant:
Universal Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Patel v. The United States et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United States and Cornell University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Research Foundation for the State University of New York v. Inpria Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
Defendant:
Inpria Corporation and JSR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goldsmith v. Syracuse University
as 5:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Goldsmith
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kearns v. Wallin et al
as 5:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kearns
Defendant:
Theodore O. Wallin and Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
