Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Armstrong-El v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv07125
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Armstrong-El
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Supreme Court and United States Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moorish American Nation et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv06396
Plaintiff:
Moorish American Nation, Joseph McGhee-Bey, Terry D. Armstrong-El and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Supreme Court and United States Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Flynn et al
as 1:2016cv09242
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Smith
Defendant:
Rita Flynn, Jennifer Armstrong, Carl DuBois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2016cv06798
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Jennifer Armstrong and Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02189
Plaintiff:
Anthony Armstrong
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, C. Miller, New York State Department of Mental Health Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Cetina et al
as 1:2013cv06960
Plaintiff:
Don Alan McLaughlin
Defendant:
Henry Cetina, Thomas Carrero, Shawn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Stallone
as 1:2013cv03817
Plaintiff:
Armstrong Wilkerson
Defendant:
David Stallone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. NBC Universal, Inc.
as 1:2012cv08137
Plaintiff:
Lorne Armstrong
Defendant:
NBC Universal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. NBC Universal, Inc.
as 7:2012cv08137
Plaintiff:
Lorne Armstrong
Defendant:
NBC Universal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06489
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
