Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayo v. Sergent Reid et al
as 1:2023cv09719
Plaintiff:
Abderanman Mayo
Defendant:
Sergent Reid, Sergent Carrington, M Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Sergent Reid et al
as 1:2023cv09721
Plaintiff:
Abderanman Mayo
Defendant:
Sergent Reid, Sergent Carrington, A. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentile v. Latona et al
as 1:2022cv08411
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Gentile, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Latona, Edward Burnett, John Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv04887
Petitioner:
Lature Irvin, Sr.
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yizar v. City of New Rochelle et al
as 1:2017cv09771
Plaintiff:
Rainier Yizar
Defendant:
City of New Rochelle, Emanuel Gonzales, Diniz Kimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leckie v. Robinson et al
as 1:2017cv08727
Plaintiff:
Naquan Leckie
Defendant:
Sean Robinson and Mauro Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07910
Plaintiff:
Grayling Smith
Defendant:
The City of New York, Gonzales and Squillaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Rabinowitz et al
as 1:2015cv05651
Plaintiff:
Prince Divine Messiah Muhammad
Defendant:
Steve Rabinowitz, New York State, Vincent Miccoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingate et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2015cv05621
Plaintiff:
Blake Wingate, Luis Correa, Kenneth Womack and others
Defendant:
New York City, Department of Correction, Board of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
