Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10662
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Mendoza Rangel et al v. Left Foot LLC et al
as 1:2018cv09894
Plaintiff:
Carlos Daniel Mendoza Rangel
Defendant:
Eugene Anthony Wilson, Theresa Doe, John Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Footing First LLC et al v. North Brook Farms LLC et al
as 7:2017cv07152
Plaintiff:
Footing First LLC , Lawton Adams and Karen Leeming
Defendant:
North Brook Farms LLC, IGK Equestrian LLC, Peter Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Credibility Capital Inc. v. Foot and Ankle Associates of the Desert, P.C. et al
as 1:2017cv06956
Plaintiff:
Credibility Capital Inc.
Defendant:
Foot and Ankle Associates of the Desert, P.C. and John Ebaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vandal-A Industries, Inc. v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04318
Plaintiff:
Vandal-A Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Inc., Foot Locker Retail, Inc. and H&C Headwear Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08219
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06744
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Clune v. Barry, Jr. et al
as 7:2016cv04441
Plaintiff:
Kevin P. Clune
Defendant:
Desmond T. Barry, Jr. , George J. Gillespie, III , Winged Foot Golf Club, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blacks v. GreenHavens Foot Doctor et al
as 1:2015cv05045
Plaintiff:
Theadore Blacks
Defendant:
GreenHavens Foot Doctor and Dr. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
