Cases 31 - 40 of 2,596
Lee et al v. Budde et al
as 7:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Davon Lee and Paul Garrett
Defendant:
Robert Budde, Justin Larchevesque and Danielle Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Brooklyn Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
Brooklyn Hospital and Dr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City University N.Y.
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
City University N.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. N.Y.C.H.A.
as 1:2023cv11322
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
N.Y.C.H.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee v. Albarran et al
as 7:2023cv11215
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lee
Defendant:
Juan Albarran, Fritz Kundrun, American Metals & Coal International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Lee v. HUD (Housing Urban Development)
as 1:2023cv11239
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee
Defendant:
HUD (Housing Urban Development)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Barnett et al
as 7:2023cv10746
Plaintiff:
Andre Lee
Defendant:
Correction Officer Barnett, Correction Officer Russo, Correction Officer Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Golaszewski et al
as 7:2023cv10695
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee
Defendant:
Richard Golaszewski and Stephen Swentzel
Petitioner:
Hunter Point Capital
Interested Party:
Oak Hill Advisors, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Levin et al v. Sarah Lawrence College et al
as 1:2023cv10236
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Levin, Santos J. Rosario and Felicia Rosario
Defendant:
Sarah Lawrence College, Lee Chen, Gumley-Haft LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
