Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Boaziz v. Torati et al
as 1:2014cv08024
Plaintiff:
Mordechai Boaziz
Defendant:
Hezi Torati , Amerevision Capital, LLC , Joshua S. Lee, Esq. and others
Counter_claimant:
Joshua S. Lee, Esq. , Amerevision Capital, LLC and Hezi Torati
Counter_defendant:
Mordechai Boaziz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Howard v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 1:2014cv01462
Plaintiff:
Lashonda Howard
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LeBlanc v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Paul LeBlanc
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. and DFS Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv07232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Capurso v. Bank & Banking et al
as 1:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant:
Bank & Banking, U.S., Corporations, Offering Products & Services, to consumers, at all named of Banks & Holding, Companies, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States Of America v. Nadeau et al
as 7:2011cv03801
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Clarence Nadeau, LVNV Funding LLC, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Andresakis v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
as 1:2009cv08411
Plaintiff:
Anthony Andresakis
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
