Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 61 - 70 of 431
Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04673
Plaintiff: Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04400
Plaintiff: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Boston Retirement System v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv04294
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan et al v. Banco Santander S.A. et al
as 1:2018cv03985
Defendant: Banco Santander S.A., Santander Investment Securities, Inc., Banco Santander (Mexico) S.A. Institucion De Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero and others
Plaintiff: Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan and Metropolitan Transportation Authority Defined Benefit Pension Plan Master Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 14
Xu v. Gridsum Holding Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv03655
Defendant: Guosheng Wi, Gridsum Holding Inc., Peng Zhang and others
Plaintiff: Peifa Xu and Xuechen Li
Consolidated Plaintiff: Xuechun Li
Petitioner: Richard Dearnley, Michael Bernstein and Carl Pierce
Consolidated Defendant: Goldman Sach (ASIA) L.L.C.
Lead Plaintiff: William R. Barth
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Hawaii Structural Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00299
Defendant: Adam M. Aron, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Jack Q. Gao and others
Plaintiff: Hawaii Structural Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund and Warren Nichols
Petitioner: Naranbold Gantulga, Linda Lao and City of Riviera Beach General Employees' Retirement System
Lead Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Pension Fund of Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Zolotukhin v. Qudian Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv09894
Defendant: Stifel, Nicolaus and Company, Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited and others
Plaintiff: Kirill Zolotukhin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Foat v. Qudian Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv09875
Defendant: Tianyu Zhu, China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, Min Luo and others
Plaintiff: Bryan D. Foat
Petitioner: Kaib Global Fund LP and Chunlei He
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Maia v. Luo et al
as 1:2017cv09796
Plaintiff: Carlos Maia
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong Securities Limited, Nomura Securities International, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Kaib Global Fund LP and Chunlei He
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?