Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Gardner et al v. Merlo et al
as 1:2019cv06701
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Gardner and Sabrina Ann Gardner
Defendant:
Joseph R. Martinetto, Aetna Corporation, CVS/Aetna Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
County of Rockland, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 7:2019cv05588
Plaintiff:
County of Rockland, New York
Defendant:
Cardinal Health Pharmacy Services, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Caremark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv12004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Collazo v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
Orlando Collazo
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Detective Joseph Cirigliano and CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mirra Pharmacy Corp. v. CVS Caremark Corportion
as 7:2015cv02598
Plaintiff:
Mirra Pharmacy Corp.
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corportion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Berkowitz v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv09045
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Berkowitz
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., CVS Caremark Corporation and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
