Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CY Ventures LLC v. DKB Household USA Corp. et al
as 7:2023cv08961
Plaintiff:
CY Ventures LLC doing business as Zs Essentials Ventures LLC,
Defendant:
DKB Household USA Corp., DKB Household Distribution AG, Zyliss USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Swinson v. Vance et al
as 1:2020cv03091
Respondent:
Cy Vance, Cynthia Brann and Joseph Fucito
Petitioner:
Randy Swinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. James et al
as 1:2019cv06333
Respondent:
Cy Vance and Letitia James
Petitioner:
Bruce Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Ruiz v. Vance
as 1:2019cv03188
Respondent:
Cy Vance
Petitioner:
Carlos Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephen v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv02225
Defendant:
Terry Hall, David Jakab, Daniel Hajer and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Stephen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. United States District Court Southern District of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
Raheem Mitchell
Defendant:
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Cy Vance, Paul Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roundtree v. New York City et al
as 1:2016cv04609
Plaintiff:
Juel Roundtree
Defendant:
New York City, The Legal Aid Society, NYC Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cytec Industries Inc. v. Allnex (Luxembourg) and CY S.C.A.
as 1:2014cv01561
Plaintiff:
Cytec Industries Inc.
Defendant:
Allnex (Luxenbourg) and CY S.C.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Nesbitt v. Gulliver et al
as 1:2013cv06538
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Nesbitt
Defendant:
Stuart Thomson Gulliver, Peter H. Moulton, Edward McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brodeur v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2011cv04650
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brodeur
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, Ray Kelly, Paul Browne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
