Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Woods v. DOE et al
as 6:2024cv06347
Plaintiff:
Lumumba Woods
Defendant:
Superintendent JOHN DOE, Dep. Kelly, Dsp K VanNote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 6:2022cv06372
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Anthony
Defendant:
Rochester General Hospital, Farhad Abtahian, MD, Jeremiah Depta, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Jones et al
as 6:2022cv06338
Plaintiff:
Byron Santos
Defendant:
Officer Jones, Sergeant D. Filighera, Sergeant Hessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Rochester Psychiatric Center et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Defendant:
Rochester Psychiatric Center, Jannette Wilson, Benita Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bangs v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00784
Plaintiff:
Steven Bangs
Defendant:
Walter William Smith, Jr., Susan Kickbush, Kelly R. Vannote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bangs v. Smith et al
as 6:2021cv06475
Plaintiff:
Steven Bangs
Defendant:
Walter William Smith, Jr., Susan Kickbush, Kelly R. Vannote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickenbacker v. John Doe No. 1 et al
as 1:2021cv00672
Defendant:
Attorney General Leticia James, John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rickenbacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Morley et al
as 6:2020cv06934
Defendant:
John Morley, MD, Scott Kelly, Haether L. McKay and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ghaffaar McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Jones et al
as 1:2019cv01042
Defendant:
Kelly, Kubik, Pawlak and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Lisson et al
as 6:2019cv06221
Defendant:
Robert Bizub, Leslie Lisson, Joyce Krygier and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
