Cases 31 - 40 of 5,363
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alan v. United States of America IRS
as 6:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
United States of America IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zamerski v. City of North Tonawanda et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Zamerski
Defendant:
City of North Tonawanda, City of North Tonawanda Police Department, Police Officer Bryan Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garland v. Yeaw et al
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kimberly R. Garland
Defendant:
Michael J. Yeaw, Rose H. Chiauzzi, Keri Witherow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Allahs kitchen llc et al v. ACC Parkpoint LLC
as 6:2024cv06171
Plaintiff:
Allahs kitchen llc and Knowledge Allah
Defendant:
ACC Parkpoint LLC and Gloria Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beard v. Mason et al
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Jada C. Beard
Defendant:
Tracey Mason, WNY Children's Psychiatric Center, Ann Marie Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bishop v. Clarence State Police
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Kriston Bishop
Defendant:
Clarence State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
