Cases 51 - 60 of 7,204
Barnett v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Lafvorne Barnett
Defendant:
State of New York, John Dow, J. Wollcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2024cv06182
Plaintiff:
Windsor Coleman
Defendant:
Wolcott, Tomprowski and John Doe/Mr. H
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lasher v. Conroy et al
as 6:2024cv06065
Plaintiff:
Brian Lasher
Defendant:
Amber Conroy, City of Niagara Falls, New York, City of Niagara Falls Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TerBorg v. Martuscello
as 6:2024cv06106
Petitioner:
Jeffrey TerBorg
Respondent:
D. Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bundscho v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv06160
Plaintiff:
Nathan R. Bundscho
Defendant:
Chief Green and William Whalden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Struble v. Tope
as 6:2024cv06036
Petitioner:
David E. Struble
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Terrance R. Anderson
Defendant:
State of New York, City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Patti et al
as 6:2024cv06117
Plaintiff:
Duntrell Calderon
Defendant:
Frank Patti, Fox, E. Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dublino v. Terrana et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Dublino
Defendant:
Gina Terrana, Michael Caputi, Shane Craft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
