Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Houmita v. United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv06631
Plaintiff:
Abdelhakim Houmita
Defendant:
United States of America, Akima Global Services LLC, AGS Officer 1 (hereinafter "TOM") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Searchfield et al
as 6:2018cv06394
Plaintiff:
Dennis A. Forbes
Defendant:
C. Searchfield, John Brennan, Jose A. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Fischer et al
as 6:2016cv06225
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, E. Gutwoin, Larkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Grady et al
as 6:2015cv06586
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Foster
Defendant:
William Grady, Tom Angell, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balkum v. Leonard et al
as 6:2014cv06352
Plaintiff:
Walter Balkum
Defendant:
John P. Leonard, Tom W. Turnbull, K. Hulett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Ryan et al
as 6:2014cv06029
Petitioner:
Khalaire Allah
Respondent:
Scott P. Ryan, N. Arquitt, Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 1:2013cv00559
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Maureen Boll, Mark L. Bradt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Franczyk et al
as 6:2011cv06104
Plaintiff:
Melzar Ti-Shawn Wilkins
Defendant:
Kelly Herkey, Mark L. Kalinowski, Jodi Ludemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNally v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
Peter McNally
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Central New York Psych Center, C.O.F. Mantaldi (Docs) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. The United States et al
as 1:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
Milton Thompson
Defendant:
The United States, Martin Horren, Brenda Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
