Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Powers v. Allard et al
as 6:2023cv06362
Plaintiff:
Eric Douglas Powers
Defendant:
Sheriff James Allard, Major David Sutton, Lieutenant Wetherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Rochester Psychiatric Center et al
as 6:2022cv06057
Plaintiff:
Darius McCollum
Defendant:
Rochester Psychiatric Center, Jannette Wilson, Benita Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. Sewalt et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Timothy Sewalt, Corey May, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almonte v. Ritts et al
as 6:2020cv07116
Defendant:
Holly DeWitt, P.O. T. Peters, P.O. Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Almonte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Turner et al
as 1:2019cv00608
Plaintiff:
Marcus West
Defendant:
Correction Officer Turner, Correction Officer . John Doe and Correction Officer Larcen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Fuller et al
as 6:2017cv06306
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Sr., Vandel C. Fuller, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Heary et al
as 1:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Dexter Scott Turner
Defendant:
Nicole Heary, D. Venettozzi, Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gochnour v. Burri et al
as 6:2015cv06174
Plaintiff:
Michael John Gochnour
Defendant:
J. Burri, M. Maltese, M. Hadfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Procopio et al
as 1:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
Nicole Turner
Defendant:
Mark Procopio, Feliciano, Chris Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. The People of the State of New York
as 6:2009cv06503
Petitioner:
Kemar Turner
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
