Cases 101 - 110 of 39,981
Stogsdill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
John Stogsdill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06322
Plaintiff:
Tonia Ellamarie Griffin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Etzel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Karen Etzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00500
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodman v. Finger Lakes Performing Provider System
as 6:2024cv06327
Plaintiff:
Andrea Woodman
Defendant:
Finger Lakes Performing Provider Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Shearman et al
as 6:2024cv06325
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ramos
Defendant:
Tina Shearman, Sarah Shearman, Racquel M. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Advance 2000, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Advance 2000, Inc.
Defendant:
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
