Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Abreu v. Hamilton et al
as 6:2015cv06155
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Robert Hamilton, Jan Szablick, Jeffrey Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell et al v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
as 1:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Abigail A Powell and James W Powell , Jr.
Defendant:
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated and Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Raymond Powell
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. New York State Office of Mental Health
as 1:2013cv01114
Plaintiff:
Rasheen Powell
Defendant:
New York State Office of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nicholson v. Fischer et al
as 6:2013cv06282
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nicholson
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Paul Chappius, Jr., Bryan Locklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 1:2013cv00559
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Maureen Boll, Mark L. Bradt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Bauer et al
as 1:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Mayo
Defendant:
D. Bauer, B. Hembrook, R. Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. USA
as 1:2013cv00042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
George Ray Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Reed et al v. Cushman et al
as 6:2012cv06655
Plaintiff:
Charles Reed, Sr. and Richard Reed
Defendant:
Kurt Cushman, James M. Sheppard, Powell Tevor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Powell v. Kaplan
as 1:2012cv00954
Petitioner:
Joyce Powell
Respondent:
Sabina Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
