Cases 31 - 40 of 554
Roberts v. Barnwell et al
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Ruth Barnwell, Christopher McClary, Q'asia Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortolano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Sammie-Jo Ann Ortolano
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abramo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Abramo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. The County of Monroe et al
as 6:2023cv06151
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Rodriguez
Defendant:
The County of Monroe, The State of New York, Chex Systems Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ann Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Aprilmarie Ann Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Warren et al
as 6:2023cv06130
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamell Miller
Defendant:
Lovely Ann Warren, City Hall and City of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cindy Marie Carroll v. JoAnn Fabrics and Crafts
as 1:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Cindy Marie Carroll
Defendant:
Jo-Ann Stores, LLC and JoAnn Fabrics and Crafts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
