Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Washup v. Melenis et al
as 1:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Washup
Defendant:
Melenis, Woods, Fracis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todie v. Buffalo Half-way House Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Todie
Defendant:
Buffalo Half-way House Inc., Leslie Greathouse, Jacqueline Diggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ekryss et al v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv06742
Plaintiff:
Jhared Ekryss, Connie Jean Juergens, Stephen Seigal and others
Defendant:
Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., Raymond A. Blanchette, III, Kevin Cottingim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Lamparelli, v. Arrow Wood, et al
as 1:2015cv00623
Plaintiff:
Lamparelli Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Arrow Wood Products, Inc. and Anthony Serrao
Counter_claimant:
Anthony Serrao and Arrow Wood Products, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Lamparelli Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. $3,800.00 United States Currency
as 1:2015mc00042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$3,800.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Ronald Woods
Woods v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wood v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv06278
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Wood
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Woods v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
as 1:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
Larry A Woods
Defendant:
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company and First Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapin Manufacturing Inc v. Wood et al
as 1:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
Chapin Manufacturing Inc
Defendant:
Gervace Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Wood v. Maccarone
as 6:2014cv06639
Petitioner:
Scott M. Wood
Respondent:
Robert M. Maccarone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
