Cases 71 - 80 of 39,981
Ally Bank v. The City Of Rochester
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ally Bank
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 6:2024cv06343
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bedell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Theresa A. Bedell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 6:2024cv06344
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. Fingerlakes1.com, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06345
Plaintiff:
Corey Sipkin Photography LLC
Defendant:
Fingerlakes1.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hunter v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner:
Jerrod Hunter
Respondent:
Superintendent Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendall Central School District v. Insuance Company of North America et al
as 6:2024cv06200
Plaintiff:
Kendall Central School District
Defendant:
Insuance Company of North America, INA Corporation and Chubb Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rexinger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Rexinger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States for the Use and Benefit of Interstate Heating, Inc. v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv06342
Plaintiff:
Interstate Heating, Inc.
Defendant:
FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
