Cases 1 - 10 of 1,253
David v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Michael R. David
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ryan et al v. The Town of Amherst et al
as 1:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Ryan, Tara M. Kreuder and Mya Ryan
Defendant:
Town of Amherst, Gregory Pigeon, Heather Kystoiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alan v. IFG Company et al
as 6:2024cv06346
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
IFG Company, Atty. Dan MacMullen, Financial Sucs. Regulatory Comm. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 1:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 6:2024cv06335
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00500
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Suffolk County
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
