Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Hughes v. Town of Amherst et al
as 1:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Danielle M Hughes
Defendant:
Town of Amherst, Town of Amherst Police Department, P.O./Det Edwin C. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cisse v. Hill et al
as 6:2023cv06575
Plaintiff:
Ali Cisse
Defendant:
G. Hill, S. Carpenter, D. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Wolcott et al
as 1:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
LeRon Bailey
Defendant:
J. Wolcott, J. West, E. Raczkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Amherst Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Samuel Tillman
Defendant:
Amherst Police Department, Det. Lt. Theodore DiNoto, Det. Sean Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Rahman et al
as 1:2022cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jared M. Bailey
Defendant:
Mohammed R. Rahman, American National Red Cross and Element Fleet Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey-Lynch v. JcPenny Hair Salon et al
as 1:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Bailey-Lynch
Defendant:
JcPenny Hair Salon, Shaniqua and Ken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06573
Plaintiff:
D'Asia Isebel Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00629
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sophia G Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
