Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Cruz v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv06293
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Cruz
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and WALMART SUPERCENTER #3280
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cruz Correa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06245
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Cruz Correa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06011
Plaintiff:
Ana Bermudez Cruz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Andrea Marie Cruz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cruz-Carmona v. USA
as 6:2023cv06443
Petitioner:
Jonathan Cruz-Carmona
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cruz v. Warden Ms./Mrs. Walcott
as 6:2022cv06046
Petitioner:
Dominick Cruz
Respondent:
Warden Ms./Mrs. Walcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06050
Plaintiff:
Edna Cruz
Defendant:
City of Rochester, City of Rochester Police Department and City of Rochester Police Officer John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez et al v. Sawicki et al
as 1:2021cv01187
Plaintiff:
Reyes Brito Rodriguez, Maria Brito Castro, Ondina Castro De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Richard D Sawicki, Patricia Sawicki, Daniel T Sawicki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall, Jr. v. City of Tonawanda et al
as 1:2021cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Tonawanda and Adam Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Cruz Ortiz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
