Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Donahue et al
as 6:2022cv06559
Plaintiff:
Frederick Diaz
Defendant:
James F. Donahue, Christopher Yehl, Timothy J. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Monroe County et al
as 1:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Julian O. Diaz
Defendant:
Monroe County and Todd Baxter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Pactiv LLC,
as 6:2019cv06419
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Hendrix
Defendant:
Pactiv LLC,
Consolidated Defendant:
Masis Staffing Solutions, LLC, Alan Bellis, Larissa Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diaz v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 6:2022cv06308
Plaintiff:
Iris Diaz
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Piotter v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 6:2021cv06533
Plaintiff:
Lori Diaz Piotter
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. White et al
as 6:2021cv06155
Defendant:
Mr. Dills, Dr. D. Williams, DSS S. White and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv06103
Petitioner:
Miguel Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06126
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Diaz, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Diaz Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06982
Plaintiff:
Shaquandrea Diaz Armstrong and Shaquandrea Diaz (Armstrong)
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
