Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fitzgerald v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06065
Plaintiff:
Edward Fitzgerald
Defendant:
City of Rochester, spencer ash, The City of Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ordonez v. Doe Superintendent et al
as 6:2020cv06580
Defendant:
John Doe Superintendent and John Doe Officers #2-5
Petitioner:
Joseph Ordonez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Leonard et al
as 1:2019cv01475
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Penny Wolfgang, Judge Patricia Maxwell, Kathleen Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Monroe County N.Y. et al
as 6:2017cv06250
Plaintiff:
William James
Defendant:
Monroe County N.Y., John Doe Officers 1-4 and Sergeant John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Heary et al
as 1:2017cv00287
Plaintiff:
Dexter Scott Turner
Defendant:
Nicole Heary, D. Venettozzi, Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. City of Geneva et al
as 6:2012cv06352
Plaintiff:
Shondalyn Tolbert
Defendant:
City of Geneva, Carmen, John Doe Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nussbaumer v. Nesbitt et al
as 6:2011cv06331
Plaintiff:
John W. Nussbaumer
Defendant:
John G. Nesbitt, Doe Officer, Seneca County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavaretta v. Chautauqua County et al
as 1:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Nancy Cavaretta
Defendant:
Chautauqua County, City of Jamestown, City Courts of Jamestown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kase v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2010cv06476
Plaintiff:
Justin Kase
Defendant:
City of Rochester, City of Rochester Police Department, David T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lian et al
as 1:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Dana P. Brown
Defendant:
Christopher Lian, Richard C. Tweddell, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
