Cases 1 - 10 of 2,815
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ellersick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06371
Plaintiff:
Michael Gerald Ellersick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Collaguazo-Sosaranga v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06364
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Collaguazo-Sosaranga
Defendant:
Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Michael R. David
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06351
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gannon v. Felicetti et al
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Kaitlynn Gannon
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael J. Felicetti, Niagara County Sheriff's Office, John and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lettieri v. Roemer et al
as 6:2024cv06335
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Michael J. Roemer, Paul E. Bonanno, Jeffery L. Bagley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmoke v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06331
Plaintiff:
Michael Stephen Schmoke
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Shearman et al
as 6:2024cv06325
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ramos
Defendant:
Tina Shearman, Sarah Shearman, Racquel M. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
