Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2020cv01822
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, Grace House Ministries and New York State Division of Parole
Plaintiff:
William D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peay v. New York State Division of Parole
as 6:2017cv06508
Petitioner:
Christopher Peay
Respondent:
New York State Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cato v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2017cv00707
Plaintiff:
Jason Cato
Defendant:
New York State Division of Parole, Christopher VanSchiak, David Englert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horace v. Gibbs et al
as 1:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
John L. Horace
Defendant:
Kevin Gibbs, Dawn Anderson, Monalto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Filipski et al
as 1:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Filipski, Wisniewski, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Voutour et al
as 1:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
Elbert Welch
Defendant:
Voutour, D. Vendetta, County of Niagara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Zaporowski et al
as 1:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
Timmie L. Haynes
Defendant:
David Zaporowski, Supervisors of David Zaporowski, New York State Division of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barksdale v. New York State Division of Parole
as 1:2009cv00170
Petitioner:
Kenneth Barksdale
Respondent:
New York State Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barksdale v. Pattersen et al
as 1:2008cv00663
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barksdale
Defendant:
David Pattersen and New York State Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cooper v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 6:2008cv06238
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cooper
Defendant:
New York State Division of Parole, Robert Dennison, Brion L. Travis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
