Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ridgecrest Associates, L.P. v. Ingersoll-Rand, Inc et al
as 6:2021cv06346
Defendant: Accudyne Industries, LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Industrial U.S., Inc., Ingersoll-Rand U.S. HoldCo., Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ridgecrest Associates, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Rand v. Denolfo et al
as 1:2019cv00985
Defendant: Cheryl Denolfo, City of Rochester, Prime Care Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mark Rand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assad v. Rand Capital Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant: Erland E Kailbourne, Robert M Zak, Rand Capital Corporation and others
Plaintiff: George Assad
Islam v. Ingersoll-Rand
as 1:2019cv00478
Defendant: Ingersoll-Rand
Plaintiff: Nauman Islam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00020
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01161
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01085
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bridgeforth v. Attica Correctional Facility
as 6:2011cv06608
Plaintiff: Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant: Attica Correctional Facility, Albert Prack, Lucien J. LeClair, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelby et al v. Ingersoll-Rand Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010mc00059
Plaintiff: Kevin Shelby , Justin S. White , Joseph E. Zdarsky and others
Defendant: Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Dresser-Rand Company v. JOMA Machine Company, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00386
Plaintiff: Dresser-Rand Company
Defendant: JOMA Machine Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?