Cases 151 - 160 of 9,285
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Culver et al. v. Churchill et al.
as 3:2023cv02454
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Culver and Ben Smith
Defendant:
Melissa Churchill and Donald Zeiters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Robert J. Gargasz Co., L.P.A. et al v. Secretary of the Treasury et al.
as 1:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Gargasz Co., L.P.A. and Robert J. Gargasz
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, Richard K. Delmar, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sterling v. City of Lima
as 3:2023cv02469
Plaintiff:
R Todd Sterling
Defendant:
City Of Lima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Banks v. Williams et al.
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rubin et al. v. City of Massillon
as 5:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
James Rubin and MaryDonna Rubin
Defendant:
City of Massillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Cleveland City Council, et al.
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Chris Martin
Defendant:
Cleveland City Council and Blaine Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
