Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Andrews v. Securus Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Amanda A Andrews and Amanda A. Andrews
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, LLC, Wyandot County Sheriff's Department, Wyandot County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. The MetroHealth System et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Chris Mealey, John Does #1-5, MetroHealth System and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lardieri v. Dupont et al
as 1:2014cv02427
Plaintiff:
Greg Lardieri
Defendant:
Dave Dupont, City of Garfield Heights, Ohio and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holly Anderson v. Connie Sutton, et al
as 5:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
Holly N. Anderson
Defendant:
Connie Sutton, Portage County Sheriff's Dept. , David Doak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zaccardelli v. Schuld et al
as 1:2013cv02423
Plaintiff:
William Zaccardelli
Defendant:
Nicholas Schuld, Daniel Toporowych, Nathan Savetski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folks v. Petitt et al
as 1:2013cv02292
Defendant:
Aaron Petitt, City of Cleveland and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Reginald Folks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
Deaire Bowman
Defendant:
Gregory C. Jones, William Tell, City of Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Grasha et al
as 1:2012cv02181
Plaintiff:
Ron Mitchell
Defendant:
David P. Grasha, Wade W. Westerfield, Shane Bauhof and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01850
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Woodforest National Bank et al
as 1:2011cv02205
Plaintiff:
Alfred Edwards
Defendant:
Woodforest National Bank, Lorretta Anderson, U.S. Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
