Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Settles v. City of Garfield Heights et al
as 1:2020cv01631
Defendant:
Robert Pitts, City of Garfield Heights and Michael Malak
Plaintiff:
Kenta Settles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settles v. Malak et al
as 1:2020cv01288
Plaintiff:
Kenta Settles
Defendant:
Patrolman Brian Regovich, City of Garfield Heights, Sergeant William Gall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio et al v. Pitts et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Petitioner:
Devin Branch , Kelvin Erby and Tracy Udrija-Peters
Respondent:
Christopher Pitts , Earnest Smith , Khadijah Guy and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
Nathaniel Martin and Barbara J. Thomas
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Christopher Pitts , Belinda Kyle , Brandon King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine v. Sevel et al
as 1:2016cv02994
Plaintiff:
Dean Devine
Defendant:
Michael Sevel , David A. Burrington , Charles A. Krejsa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Ballinger et al
as 3:2016cv02948
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dewayne Pitts
Defendant:
Theresa Ballinger , Jason Warner , C. Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Quilter et al
as 3:2013cv02300
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Pitts
Defendant:
J. Bernie Quilter, W. E. Sumner and Frederick H. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gessic v. Village of Bentleyville et al
as 1:2007cv03201
Plaintiff:
Stephen Scott Gessic
Defendant:
Village of Bentleyville, Harvey Bruner, Debbie Alexlrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
