Cases 1 - 10 of 54
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King III v. Souders et al.
as 1:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Roy King III
Defendant:
Amanda Souders, Greg Frankart, Jason Flick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Lance Jermaine Harris
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Jody L. King and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. Bobby
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Deny L. King
Respondent:
Dave Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. McGraw
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Karl L. King
Defendant:
Attorney Brian R. McGraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
King v. Fender et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Todd A. King
Defendant:
Warden Warden Fender, Assistant Warden Ms King, Unit Manager Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00713
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Feathers v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
David E. Feathers
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Chief Inspector Chris Lambert, Warden Leon Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson, Jr. v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Beth Oehler, Thomas King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA
as 1:2021cv01387
Petitioner:
Errol Dontes King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
