Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sanchez v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Obed I. Sanchez
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Jerry Greene, Sheriff, Warden Cappibianca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Healy
as 4:2023cv01825
Petitioner:
Reginald Myers
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lumbus v. Weishar, et al.
as 1:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
Brian Lumbus, Jr.
Defendant:
GCI Investigator Steve Weishar, GCI RIB Lieutenant Elizabeth Wyant, GCI Warden Keith J. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Jori Anderson, Ms. Shaffer, Kelly Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Wood County
as 3:2019cv02564
Defendant:
Wood County
Plaintiff:
Craig R. Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heyward et al v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv02499
Defendant:
Ibrahim Abdulrahim Al-Hagg, Dr. B. Potts, K. Riehle and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Cooper, Mathew May, Mark White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiser v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab & Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02406
Defendant:
Karen Stanforth, Ohio Dept. of Rehab & Corrections, Tracy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Kiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Massaro v. Clipper, et al.
as 1:2019cv01023
Defendant:
Warden Kimberly Clipper, Barbara Gainer, Tracie Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Massaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Williams
as 4:2019cv00476
Petitioner:
John Myers
Respondent:
Warden Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
