Cases 11 - 20 of 142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Lumbus v. Weishar, et al.
as 1:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
Brian Lumbus, Jr.
Defendant:
GCI Investigator Steve Weishar, GCI RIB Lieutenant Elizabeth Wyant, GCI Warden Keith J. Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Jori Anderson, Ms. Shaffer, Kelly Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. S and H Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Chad Myers
Defendant:
S and H Partners, LLC, LRH Ent Inc., ZXB Logistics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Keystone Drill Services, Inc. v. Davey Kent, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Keystone Drill Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Davey Kent, Inc. and J. Thomas Myers, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Myers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv02381
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Myers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
